Record

What mountain tourism earns

Three years, three mountains, eleven thousand climbers, and a little over three-quarters of a million pesos spread across an entire municipality.

Between 2013 and 2015, mountain ecotourism brought an estimated ₱768,610 into Lobo's local economy, with roughly 80 to 85 percent of it reaching local stakeholders. The largest shares went to transport services and to village guides and porters. Mount Banoy accounted for ₱726,452 of the total.

This is the only figure that exists for what tourism is actually worth to Lobo, and it is worth reading carefully, because it is small. Three years of activity across three mountains, nearly eleven thousand climbers, and the whole thing amounts to a little over three-quarters of a million pesos.

The distribution matters more than the total. The money went to guides and porters, to sari-sari stores, to tricycle and jeepney drivers and one horse, to village entrance fees, and to farmers selling atis, avocado, coconuts and mangoes directly to hikers. Beach resorts captured ₱28,680 of it, because day hikers mostly went home.

Where the money went

Local economic benefit of mountain ecotourism, Lobo, 2013–2015 (₱)
CategoryMt. BanoyNaguilingTilosTotal
Transport services, Manila to jump-off345,9963,7604,543354,299
Village guide and porter fees212,50022,5001,500236,500
Sari-sari store sales125,666600185126,451
Beach resorts27,78090028,680
Local transport (jeep, tricycle, horse)26,80826,808
Village entrance fees12,6107,12019,730
Direct sales of farm products1,9001,0502,950
Total726,45235,0307,128768,610

Figures in Philippine pesos, 2013–2015.

The guides

As of December 2015 there were 43 registered mountain guides across the three peaks — 33 on Banoy, eight on Naguiling, two on Tilos — with an average age in the mid-thirties. Most had secondary education, ten on Banoy had primary education only, and seven were college undergraduates.

What the community said

The research also recorded what the community thought about it. Across fifty participants in a facilitated discussion, mountain ecotourism scored 3.05 out of 4 on incoming benefits and was rated acceptable by 92 percent. But the same group scored the potential downsides at 3.06, with the sharpest concerns being litter, soil compaction, erosion and tree cutting at 3.84, and alcohol and drugs coming into the villages at 3.7. The lead author gave the risk a name: Mount Lalayag Syndrome, the pattern in which local tourism governance is pushed by lobbying toward unlimited ascents until the mountains stagnate ecologically.

That tension belongs on the page rather than hidden. Source: Caringal et al. (2017), From logging to blogging, Asia Life Sciences 26(2): 257–282. The arrival counts behind these figures are on mountain arrivals, 1999–2015.

Lobo, Batangas · 13°38′50″N 121°12′37″E · PSGC 0401015000

Edition 0 · Revised 27 JUL 2026